A wearable that informs health decisions carries a responsibility: to prove that what it reports is real. As the MCT-1 approaches launch, clinical validation is the work that earns that trust.
Why validation comes before scale
It would be easy to ship first and study later. We're doing it the other way around. Anchoring the MCT-1's signals to established clinical measures is how a number on your dashboard becomes something a clinician can rely on.
What the process involves
Validation means comparing the device against reference measures across real conditions — activity, sleep, and flares — and across different bodies, so accuracy holds for the whole community, not just an average of it.
Trust in a health device is built in the study, not the marketing.
Transparency as a standard
We intend to be clear about what the evidence supports and where it's still developing. Honest limits are part of good science, and part of the promise we make to anyone who wears the device.